Thursday, February 6, 2014

Recap of the January LA Legal Innovation Meetup

    Excerpt:

    'I had the pleasure of joining my first Los Angeles Legal Innovation/ Legal Hacking Meetup group last Monday, January 27th. It was held at IndieDesk, which is a co-working space located downtown on Broadway, between 8th and 9th street. The speaker, Adam Long from Praedicat Inc., discussed the effect of big data on the legal field. The first question that popped into my head was: What is big data? Adam mentioned that there is really no standard definition for big data; however, a simplified definition is: “high volumes of data that cannot be analyzed by traditional ways or
    tools.” The collection of big data can predict future events, upcoming trends, and patterns within the legal field. Adam gave us four examples of how big data impacts law-practice: eDiscovery, legal spending management, litigation management and risk management. [...]'

    For more details, please see the complete post.


Monday, February 3, 2014

SnapTerms: Applying the Pareto Principle to Internet Law

I'm excited about the new crop of law startups that are offering what I like to call "mass customization" or "pareto law". That is, 80% of clients have the same needs, 80% of the contractual language/work is standardized, and it's only the last 20% that's actually customized to a client's needs. Note though that I don't think the 80/20 rule applies to litigation. Fairdocument (SF) seems to be doing this for estate planning because, let's face it-- if you're married, have two kids without special needs, and are worth less than a couple million, you probably have the same needs as 80% of the American population. Snapterms (LA) is using the 80/20 rule for terms of service, as co-Founder Hansen Tong explains below.

Tell me a bit about yourself.
I am the co-founder of SnapTerms, and also provide legal services through my law firm, Kelly Warner Law.  I specialize in what people call “Internet Law,” so I generally work with startups, online companies, internet business owners, and internet marketing firms. I advise clients on terms of service, privacy policies, COPPA, TCPA, Can-Spam, CDA, and DCMA. My firm also helps with contracts, funding, corporate governance, and some intellectual property. Essentially, we help companies with what they deal with on the Internet.

Tell me more about SnapTerms.
SnapTerms is a service that helps users draft terms of service (TOS) at an affordable price based on a user’s description. We use software to generate the document and have a lawyer review them. We’re in between a Legalzoom, which generates automated template, and a full service law firm, which prepares a customized contract. We have a number of offerings, but the whole package costs between $300-600. I’ve seen competitors offering both a terms of service and privacy policy for $1000.  We also do funny Terms of Service and Privacy Policies, since normal Terms of Service and Privacy Policies tend to run a bit on the dry side. At a full service law firm, it could cost up to $10,000. It just depends on who’s doing it, their experience, and their hourly or flat rate.
 
Why this workflow?
It makes things more efficient and keeps costs down.  

How did you guys get started?
We’ve been operating for about two years. In my regular law practice, we work with lots of companies, but the rate we charge for drafting is generally more than what some bootstrapping entrepreneurs are willing to pay.

What are terms of service? Why and when would an online business need that? 
It’s a contract between you and your online clients or customers. For example, what if a customer buys something and it breaks? You need a document that explains your return policy.  A TOS is basically a relationship document that outlines a company’s policies and its relationship with its customers.

How about privacy policies? 
If you do business in California, meaning you are in California or have a customer in California, it’s required.  Even if you aren’t doing business in California, it’s a good idea to have a privacy policy in place. A privacy policy essentially details to the user how you collect their personal information, what you collect, what you don’t collect (e.g., user habits or IP addresses, non-personally identifiable information), how you plan on using that information, who you plan on sharing it with, what cookies you use, what tracking you use, where you plan on storing it, how you secure it, and what rights users have to it. I like to call it the who, what, when, where, and why document.

And what are the consequences if you don’t have either one of these?
If you don’t have a TOS and get sued, then a court will interpret your rights. We advise clients not to go that route because the court can do whatever it wants if there’s no contract. In California, if you don’t have a privacy policy, the Attorney General could come after you.

At what point should an online business get a TOS/privacy policy then?
I would recommend getting a TOS/Privacy Policy before the website or application goes live. You definitely should have TOS before you form any relationship with any clients or customers. For the Privacy Policy, get one before you start collecting any personal or non-personal user information.

What the most interesting TOS you’ve come across?
I like Pinterest’s TOS because they break down the legalese into little blurbs that decipher the language for average users. Most users don’t understand the TOS, so anything that can give them clear guidance always stands out.

What is SnapTerm’s greatest challenge? 

We’re looking for funding and trying to expand and diversify our document offerings. We’ve already gotten past the idea state and are now thriving but the challenge for us is scaling while making sure that our customer is satisfied and that we’re doing things the right way.

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Upcoming Legal Innovation Conferences

A good number of you are probably going to the Reinvent Law conference in NYC next week, but for us West Coasters who can't afford the plane ticket, Stanford is hosting the FutureLaw 2014 conference in May. Agenda below.

AGENDA

9:00 AM – 9:30 AM
Opening Keynote: : “The Future of Lawyers: From Denial to Disruption” – Richard Susskind
In his keynote address, Richard Susskind will argue that three factors – cost, liberalisation, information technology – will combine in the coming decade to transform the way in which legal services are provided. He will explain and discuss the implications of commoditisation and decomposition of legal services, and suggest various techniques for the alternative sourcing of legal work. He will offer long-term predictions for the new legal landscape, including the future for law firms and law schools, the shifting role of in-house lawyers, the relevance of new competitors, the impact of disruptive technologies, the emergence of online legal services, and the coming of virtual hearings and online dispute resolution.  Throughout, he will support his claims through case studies draw from within and beyond the legal profession. Looking longer term, Susskind will outline the likely implications for the law of artificial intelligence, pervasive mobile computing, and great increases in computing power.
Professor Susskind will be participating remotely.
___________________________________________________________
9:30 AM – 10:30 AM
Forging an Open Legal Document Ecosystem
The legal industry is an information industry. However, lack of access to data hinders continued innovation and inhibits the creation of whole categories of technologies. How do we unlock this data? What are the benefits of a more open data ecosystem for the law, and what are the threats?
Brian Carver, Free Law Project
Thomas Bruce, Legal Information Institute
Paul Sawaya, Restatement
Monica Bay, Law Technology News (moderator)
___________________________________________________________
11:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Managing Legal Marketplaces
By now, a generation of new legal businesses have emerged to disaggregate the traditional law firm model. The result is a number of vibrant legal marketplaces: lawyers as free agents competing in an open marketplace online to offer services. How are these marketplaces managed? And, where do they go into the future?
Matt Faustman, Upcounsel
Raj Abyanker, Legal Force
Eddie Hartman, Legalzoom
Mark Britton, Avvo
Jason Boehming, Fenwick and West (moderator)
___________________________________________________________
1:00 PM – 2:00 PM
Rebuilding Legal Education
Many voices have railed against the classic curriculum of law school, but a consensus has yet to emerge as to what will replace it. How will the increased prevalence of legal technology shape legal training? How does law school look different in a world with greater automation, open data, and more empowered clients?
Richard Granat, Granat Legal Services
Janelle Orsi, Sustainable Economies Law Center
* Jason Solomon (moderator)
___________________________________________________________
2:30 PM – 3:30 PM
Legal Technology in the Public Interest
Lawyers and companies alike tend to focus on the commercial aspects of legal technology. However, legal technology also holds the potential to improve access to justice and reinvent some of the classic problems that have dogged public interest legal services. This panel examines the latest, and raises case studies that explore the use of these technologies to produce broader societal good.
Ronald W. Staudt, Apps for Justice
* Margaret Hagan, Institute of Design at Stanford
Stephanie Kimbro, Indiana Legal Services
Phil Malone, Stanford Law School (moderator)
___________________________________________________________
4:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Legal Ethics in the Age of Machines
While the coming wave of automation in the legal industry creates many new opportunities, it also raises a host of novel concerns in legal ethics and in the unauthorized practice of law. Is our existing framework around the professional regulation of lawyers adequate? What should the ethical responsibilities be for those designing automated systems that engage in legal action? What can we learn from the democratization of legal services more generally online?
Harry Surden, Colorado Law School
* Deborah Rhode, CLP
Norm Spaulding, Stanford Law School
Will Hornsby, ABA
Tim Hwang, Robot Robot & Hwang (moderator)
___________________________________________________________
5:00 PM – 5:30 PM
Closing Keynote – Michael Genesereth
Description is forthcoming. 

Thursday, January 30, 2014

2013 Movers and Shakers

The year in law startup funding....

February 2014
Ravel Law raises $8.1M in funding.

January 2014
In early January 2014, Los Angeles law startup grandpa LegalZoom made a $425M deal to sell roughly half of the company to a private equity firm, thereby giving up on its IPO dreams. PandoDaily has an extensive analysis and reaction here. Apparently the Los Angeles startup scene is underwhelmed.

December 2013
Late November 2013, newcomer NYC-based Shake Law raised $3M.
Intuit acquires small-business document repository LA-based DocStoc.
SF-based LawPal raises $400K.

October 2013
Y-Combinator's first law startup LawDingo (NYC) received more funding, raising $850K to date.
SF-based Y-Combinator startup Wevorce raises $1.7M.
SF-based Upcounsel raises $1.5M.
Y-Combinator backed Casetext raises $1.7M

July 2013
LegalReach raises $900K.

June 2013
CBInsights releases study on funding of legal tech startups

May 2013
SF-based Judicata raised $2M from investors, including Peter Thiel of Paypal
Lex Machina closes $4.8M Series A funding
RocketLawyer acquires LawPivot, raises $15M

April 2013
Wevorce and LegalForce give law startup demos

March 2013
Y-Combinator accepts its first law startup LawDingo

February 2013
LegalForce opens it's walk-in office


It sounds like a few other deals are in the works for this year, so we hope to hear publicly soon. 2014 should be an interesting year for law startups!

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Open Data Day-- Saturday, Feb. 22, 2014

This looks interesting! Robert Richards says that "Legal data projects are usually worked on during Open Data Day, so this event may be of interest." More information here:

'Open Data Day is a gathering of citizens in cities around the world to writeapplications, liberate data, create visualizations and publish analyses using open public data to show support for and encourage the adoption open data policies by the world's local, regional and national governments.

These hackathons, like small pieces, will be loosely joined by 5 basic principles.

It can be as big or as small, as long or as short, as you'd like it.

Ottawa's open data community attracts a diverse crowd of people to hackathons, with whole families coming out. In the UK groups have done amazing work getting young and diverse group hacking. Veteran hackers have said it over and over again: Our movement is stronger when it is broader.

Want to help organize one in your city and/or participate? Add your name to the relevant city on the wiki. Let's try to keep it to one event per city, build some community and get new people together.

Could be a local or global app, a visualization, proposing a standard for common data sets, scraping data from a government website to make it available for others or even creating your own data catalog of government data.

Each city's hackathon should do at least one demo, brainstorm, proposal, or anything that it shares in an interactive way with at members of a hackathon in at least one other city. This could be via video stream, skype, by chat... anything but let's get to know one another and share what we are hacking on. There may be some challenges to making this work: timezones, languages, culture... but who cares, we are problem solvers, let's make it work.

Again, let's not try to boil the ocean. Let's have a bunch of events, where people care enough to organize them, and try to link them together with a simple short connection/presentation. Above all let's raise some awareness, create something, and have some fun.

A lot will be going on. So... expect to:

Learn more about open data.
Find out how your local and national government could do more to release open data.
Engage local non-profits and companies in the uses of open data for the products and missions
Meet & network with tons of cool people in your city and around the world.
Voice your opinion & share your ideas with the people and media attending.
Find out about apps being created, and get to play around with them as well.
Help out with parts of the conceptualization, creation, design, advertisement and testing of apps.
Conduct an open tutorial sessions around using open data,like learning how to customize google maps to show the data you want to show.
Have lots and lots of fun.

Anything! Bring your laptops, mobile phones, phasers set to stun, etc. but above all, your energy and your brains! We’re trying to make this event very hands on, so feel free to bring all your wacky geektronics so that you can participate in all the fun. Don't worry if you don’t bring anything since there will still be tons of stuff to do.'

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Happy New Year, and a few changes

When you're through changing, you're through. --Bruce Barton

Happy 2014 Readers!

My apologies for not updating in awhile. Life's been busy with moving, moving again, and wedding planning. It's been an incredible last few months, and I wanted to say thanks to all my readers. I could never have imagined that blogging on a nerdy, minute subject that most people have never heard about could yield over 2500 views in under two months. That may not sound like a lot to you, but considering the subject, I'm very surprised.

Secondly, after a bit of both personal and professional reflection, I want to let you all know that I'll be making some slight changes to the scope of the blog.

You see, when I set out to interview law startups, I wanted to learn what lessons, failures, and successes those already operating law startup had learned. From the interviews this past year, it's pretty clear-- building a sustainable business model is the biggest challenge, hands down. I guess it doesn't take a genius to figure that one out, since that's the biggest challenge of any startup in general.

Since August 2013, I've contacted and/or interviewed numerous law startups. Some have had a writeup, others never got back to me (boo), and still more are out there working on the next great thing. I've come across more legal marketplace ideas than I could have imagined existed. At the same time, I presume readers may get bored reading about marketplace after marketplace.

At the same time, from both readers and meetup attendees, I've noticed that this blog has attracted two crowds-- one is, of course, those who call themselves legal hackers, and are passionate about legal innovation and changing the legal industry through technology and a different mental lens; the other is the group of newly minted and somewhat displaced lawyers looking for opportunity given that the legal market fell out during the recession.

Since I'm in the process of reinventing my career as well, I started thinking about what opportunities these young and hungry lawyers might do well to think about. Around Christmas, I happened across If I Knew Then, a website with advice on careers, finance, and life from Harvard MBA grads from the Class of 1963. A few pieces from the career section stuck out at me:


Go where things are changing — or about to change. 
Quietly but firmly get ahead of that wagon.
-THOMAS E. REILLY JR.

and this:


In the middle 1950s, when I graduated from high school, the United States was producing 50 percent of the world’s GNP. It was the world’s factory for sophisticated goods — autos, trucks, farm machinery, appliances, railroad equipment, machine tools, and industrial equipment of all kinds. General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler were world giants. Most of the factories were in the “industrial heartland” of the country, including my home state of Ohio. I went to the Harvard Business School thinking I wanted to be an executive in a manufacturing company.

After 10 years of slogging, I left manufacturing for an agribusiness and natural resources company. Being repotted was a success. I enjoyed being the CEO and building the new company.

In hindsight, I realize the lack of real opportunity in my early career was not due to any mistakes I made or to company politics. It was because the opportunities in a declining industry are so constrained, especially compared to an industry that is growing rapidly. With declining growth, companies and their executives become defensive. They do not take risks, and they focus on preserving the status quo.
--SCOTT SPANGLER


These new attorneys (or I, for that matter) could go work for a traditional law firm and spend 10 years of billable hours working to gain expertise and authority, and hope that the billable hour survives beyond complex litigation. But I personally can't fathom that. In the, oh, two weeks I've been on indeed.com and craigslist, the positions out there look depressingly boring. And so, I started thinking about where I might be able to gain expertise and authority quickly in something new and exciting. The answer to that--wherever there's change. Be it healthcare law (with the wave of change from Obamacare) or the developing standards and regulations around drones, cloud computing, or data privacy, these are the places new lawyers should be looking if they want to quickly build expertise, authority, and autonomy. (It goes without saying that they should actually be interested in those topics)


So for 2014, I'd like to broaden the scope of this blog. Aside from law startups and the legal hacking movement, I'm going to make an effort to learn more about emerging fields where law and technology intersect. That's not to say I'm ditching the whole law startup thing--I only hope to inspire those in the latter category with hope that there is so much opportunity out there for the taking. After all, I truly believe that with the power of the Internet, nowadays, your career is what you make of it.

One last note for all you job seekers (including me): There's always change in every legal field, usually through a change in laws or regulations. Be mindful, though, of the lifetime of that change. Immigration reform work via the Dream Act, while wonderful, will probably bring an onslaught of transactional works, but only for a limited time. Same goes for mortgage backed securitys (MBS) litigation. The work is great now, but won't last forever. (I'm no expert in either of those fields though, so just take the general thought in case I'm wrong)

Just keepin' it real,
Amy